Welcome to thePolitics / Culture / Internet

Latest News

View all ↗

Viral Right Now

View all ↗

Politics

View all ↗

Entertainment

View all ↗

The Vault

View all ↗

The Follow-Up

View all ↗

David Walliams Accused of Grooming Teenage Girls After Losing Court Battle to Block Investigation

Share

For months, the identity of a famous British entertainer fighting to prevent a major sexual misconduct investigation from being published was hidden behind three letters: PPT.

On Tuesday, November 10, the name finally became public. It was David Walliams.

The 55-year-old comedian, former Britain's Got Talent judge and bestselling children's author is facing serious allegations from women who say he used his celebrity status to pursue them sexually, including two who say they were just 15 when he first contacted them.

The accusations were uncovered during a three-year investigation by ITV News and The Guardian. Journalists contacted more than 100 people, obtained accounts from over 30 sources with firsthand knowledge of Walliams' alleged behavior, and examined emails, messages and other records dating back more than two decades.

Walliams denies the allegations, including grooming, sexual assault, harassment and abusing his position.

One woman, identified under the pseudonym Alex, says she first encountered Walliams at a Little Britain fan event in January 2004. She was 15, still attending school and hoping to become a comedy writer.

Alex handed him copies of scripts she had written, along with her contact information. Days later, Walliams called her at home.

The call meant so much to the teenager that she immediately wrote down their conversation. The handwritten notes, subsequently examined by The Guardian, describe Walliams praising her writing and discussing the possibility of helping her career.

Emails obtained by the investigators show the two remained in contact. By October 2005, when Alex was 17, the conversations had taken a different turn.

Walliams complimented photographs she sent him, asked for additional pictures and made suggestive remarks. Alex alleges he later requested sexually explicit photographs and that their relationship became sexual in the spring of 2006.

She says she visited his London home on three occasions and had sex with him while she was 17.

Alex described the encounters as consensual at the time, but now believes she was groomed. She says the age difference, his fame and her hopes of entering the entertainment industry created a significant imbalance between them.

Walliams' lawyers dispute her account of the relationship's development. They say he believed Alex was 18 when their contact resumed, deny that he groomed her and say he does not recall asking for sexual photographs.

Another woman, identified as Jade, alleges Walliams contacted her through MySpace in 2007 when she was just 15.

According to Jade, the comedian initiated a private conversation, obtained her phone number and began communicating with her regularly. She was excited that someone she recognized from television had taken an interest in her.

The two eventually arranged to meet at a cafe in London's Soho neighborhood. Jade says Walliams asked about her sexual history before kissing her and inviting her to his house.

Once inside, she alleges he initiated sexual touching that made her uncomfortable. She says she pulled away and that he stopped.

Jade, now in her 30s, considers what happened to be sexual assault and grooming.

Walliams categorically denies having any sexual contact with Jade. His lawyers reject the allegations of criminal wrongdoing.

The investigation also includes accounts from adult women who describe unwanted attention, persistent advances and uncomfortable encounters with the comedian.

One woman, Sarah, says she was 18 when she met Walliams during filming of Britain's Got Talent in 2016.

She and a friend later accepted an invitation to his home, where Walliams allegedly attempted to kiss her despite her lack of interest.

Sarah says she became heavily intoxicated during the evening and that Walliams began helping her upstairs. She believed he was leading her toward his bedroom rather than the guest rooms where she and her friend were supposed to sleep.

Her friend intervened and took her to a separate room.

Walliams' lawyers dispute that account. They deny he attempted to take advantage of Sarah, say he does not recall anyone being drunk and maintain there was no sexual contact.

Eight months later, Sarah's friend received a letter from lawyers representing Walliams after discussing her experiences with other young women.

The letter warned of possible legal consequences if she disclosed private information about him and demanded a written undertaking within 24 hours.

Walliams' representatives say the letter was sent because they believed the woman was preparing to sell an account he considered untrue. They also cited concerns about the impact on his family.

But the allegations are not confined to encounters in his private life.

Behind the scenes at Britain's Got Talent, production staff had reportedly discussed Walliams' contact with younger female employees.

WhatsApp messages obtained by the investigators show staff expressing concern about his behavior toward female production assistants, commonly called runners.

One 19-year-old employee showed colleagues messages and social media comments she had received from Walliams. Another former staff member recalled a young woman asking how she should respond after the famous judge allegedly asked her out.

Walliams denies sexually harassing female employees or behaving inappropriately at work.

The show's production companies, Fremantle and Syco, say they were unaware of the allegations and had received no complaints concerning him. ITV said Fremantle had confirmed that no complaint had been made to the production company.

There were concerns at HarperCollins, too.

The publisher, which helped turn Walliams into one of Britain's most successful children's authors, reportedly received complaints about his conduct toward younger female employees years before ending its relationship with him.

According to the joint investigation, Walliams began a sexual relationship with a junior employee in 2017. His lawyers describe the relationship as consensual. Sources told reporters that the woman subsequently regarded it as an abuse of power.

Another employee reportedly raised concerns after a younger colleague received unwanted invitations from Walliams.

An internal inquiry began at HarperCollins in late 2023. At least five female employees reportedly discussed their experiences, and managers were informed about the relationship involving the junior employee.

The inquiry concluded in 2024 without consequences for Walliams, according to The Guardian. One woman who participated subsequently left the company with a reported five-figure settlement and a confidentiality agreement.

HarperCollins continued publishing Walliams' books until December 2025, when it announced it would no longer release new titles by the author. In September 2026, the company said it would also stop publishing his existing catalog.

Walliams denies workplace harassment and previously said the allegations behind the publisher's internal inquiry had never been put to him.

By then, journalists had already been investigating his conduct for years.

When ITV News and The Guardian approached Walliams for comment in May 2026, the matter escalated into a legal battle over whether their findings could be published at all.

Walliams sought a potentially indefinite High Court injunction against the two news organizations, arguing that publication posed a grave threat to his life.

The court heard medical evidence concerning his psychiatric condition and two suicide attempts following the journalists' requests for comment. His legal team argued that preventing publication was necessary to protect his life and family relationships.

On November 3, High Court judge Mr. Justice Nicklin rejected the application.

The judge accepted that the risk to Walliams was genuine and serious. However, he concluded that the proposed injunction would interfere profoundly with freedom of expression, preventing the news organizations from reporting matters of substantial public interest and restricting the women's ability to tell their stories.

Walliams was initially protected by anonymity while an appeal remained possible.

His lawyers confirmed they would not appeal before the November 9 deadline. The allegations were published the following day.

The court's decision did not establish that Walliams committed sexual misconduct. The judge expressly stated that he had not determined whether the allegations were true.

In a written response to the investigators, Walliams acknowledged that he had sometimes behaved thoughtlessly in casual relationships and regretted not taking other people's feelings sufficiently into account.

He nevertheless denied ever exploiting the power that came with his celebrity status.

"I am not a sexual predator. I have not broken the law," he wrote.

Walliams, who became internationally known through Little Britain before building a hugely successful career writing children's books, had already experienced several professional setbacks.

He left Britain's Got Talent after offensive comments he made about contestants were published in 2022. He apologized for those remarks.

His publishing deal ended in 2025, and the Alton Towers theme park recently confirmed the closure of its World of David Walliams attraction, although the park attributed that decision to its regular review of attractions rather than the newly published allegations.

The ITV News documentary David Walliams: Power and Silence has now brought the women's accounts and the failed legal battle to a wider audience.

Walliams continues to deny grooming, sexual assault, harassment and other wrongdoing. The allegations have not been proven in criminal court.

See more:

The Guardian and ITV News: Full investigation

High Court judgment, November 3, 2026

Ethan Klein Posts Ukulele Photo Amid Divorce Scandal, and the Internet Has Questions

Share



Ethan Klein has returned to social media with a ukulele, of all things, as the fallout from his marriage breakdown and the collapse of his H3 Podcast partnership continues.

On November 9, the YouTuber posted an Instagram story showing a ukulele resting on a couch, without any caption or explanation.

The seemingly ordinary photograph quickly attracted attention because of its timing and the instrument's unusual place in internet controversy history.

In 2023, YouTuber Colleen Ballinger infamously responded to allegations about her conduct with a ukulele song titled Toxic Gossip Train, sparking widespread ridicule online.

Some viewers interpreted Klein's photograph as a possible reference to Ballinger's video. However, Klein has not publicly confirmed what the image was intended to mean.

The post comes just one week after Hila Klein filed for divorce from her husband on November 2 in Los Angeles County Superior Court, following her public accusation that he had conducted an affair lasting more than six months.

The filing lists October 13 as the couple's separation date and cites irreconcilable differences. Hila is seeking joint custody of their three children, spousal support, payment of her legal fees and restoration of her maiden name, Hacmon.

The couple married in 2012 and spent more than a decade building a YouTube and podcasting business together.

Following Hila's accusations in October, members of the H3 Podcast team publicly sided with her and announced that they would no longer work with Ethan or participate in arrangements that financially benefited him.

Ethan subsequently stated that he was working to remove his ownership and financial interests from the podcast and shared businesses, including Teddy Fresh and Teddy Glow.

The H3 Podcast remains on indefinite hiatus, with its future uncertain.

Now, instead of a conventional public explanation, Klein's latest reported social media activity has sent viewers back into speculation.

Whether the ukulele was an attempted joke, a reference to Ballinger or something else entirely remains unknown. But with the divorce proceedings underway and the podcast's future unresolved, even a photograph without a caption is drawing attention.

James Gunn OUT at DC Studios as Marvel Veteran Takes Over

Share

James Gunn's time running DC Studios is coming to an end, and the director sounds more relieved than disappointed.

On Monday, November 9, Skydance announced that Gunn and fellow DC Studios co-chief Peter Safran would step down after four years, with former Marvel Studios executive Jeremy Latcham taking over as president and chief creative officer on December 1.

The unexpected shake-up comes just weeks after Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery completed their massive merger, leaving the future direction of the DC Universe back in the hands of new leadership.

Gunn and Safran were appointed in 2022 to rebuild DC's superhero franchise and create a connected universe capable of competing with Marvel. Their efforts delivered a commercially successful Superman in 2025, earning approximately $618.7 million worldwide, but subsequent releases produced mixed results.

Supergirl earned around $126 million against a reported $170 million production budget, while the R-rated Clayface has brought in approximately $109 million globally.

Following the announcement, Gunn released a lengthy statement reflecting on his tenure, acknowledging that the experience had been difficult behind the scenes.

He described the corporate responsibilities of running a major studio as exhausting and said he was "incredibly relieved and excited to get back to pure filmmaking."

However, Gunn isn't finished with DC.

He's still working on Man of Tomorrow, the upcoming Superman follow-up featuring Clark Kent and Lex Luthor, and revealed that he has been engaged to write another DC project that has yet to be announced.

Latcham brings considerable Marvel experience, having worked on films including Iron Man, The Avengers and Guardians of the Galaxy. He will oversee DC's film, television and animation operations.

The leadership change leaves questions about the long-term plans Gunn and Safran originally established for the DC Universe. No wholesale reboot has been announced, and projects already in production are continuing.

For Gunn, the executive job may be over, but his involvement with Superman and the DC characters he helped bring back to theaters isn't ending just yet.

Russell Brand Sentenced to 10½ Years in Prison for Rape and Sexual Assault

Share


Russell Brand has been sentenced to 10 years and six months in prison after being convicted of raping one woman and sexually assaulting three others.

The 51-year-old learned his sentence Monday, November 9, at Southwark Crown Court in London, where a jury found him guilty of four sexual offenses last Thursday.

Judge Joel Bennathan described Brand as a sexual predator who believed his celebrity status allowed him to behave however he pleased.

The judge criticized Brand's "staggering arrogance" and said his fame had helped shield him from accountability for years.

Brand received nine years for the rape conviction, with an additional 18 months added for the sexual assault offenses.

He must serve two-thirds of his 10½-year sentence in custody before being released under supervision. He will also remain on Britain's sex offender registry for life.

The convictions involve four women who were assaulted between 2004 and 2009, when Brand was becoming one of Britain's most recognizable television personalities.


One woman, who was 21 at the time, was raped at Brand's London home in 2009 after meeting him following a stand-up performance. Three other women, who worked in television and radio, were sexually assaulted during encounters connected to his entertainment career.

During Monday's hearing, the court heard victim impact statements where one woman said Brand's fame, wealth and influence had made her feel powerless and afraid she wouldn't be believed.

Another described carrying feelings of shame for more than two decades.

Brand's defense attorney argued that he had changed significantly since the offenses and was now a different person from the celebrity he had been during the 2000s.

The judge acknowledged some mitigating factors, including the absence of reported offenses in the past 17 years, but said the seriousness of the crimes demanded a lengthy prison sentence.

Brand had denied all seven charges during his four-week trial, insisting he had never engaged in nonconsensual sexual activity.

The jury convicted him of one count of rape and three counts of sexual assault but acquitted him of two additional rape charges and one count of attempted indecent assault.

His wife, Laura Gallacher, attended Monday's sentencing. Brand was reportedly composed as the sentence was delivered and spoke briefly to her before being led away.

The case began following a September 2023 joint investigation by The Sunday Times, The Times and Channel 4's Dispatches, which prompted a police investigation into allegations involving multiple women.

Detectives subsequently interviewed more than 100 witnesses and examined thousands of documents while investigating accusations dating back more than two decades.

Following the sentencing, Detective Superintendent Andy Furphy praised the women who came forward and acknowledged the difficulties they faced during the investigation and trial.

Brand remains under investigation over two additional rape allegations involving separate women, including one who was 16 at the time of the alleged offense. No convictions have been secured in those matters.

The British comedian, who starred in Forgetting Sarah Marshall, Get Him to the Greek and Arthur, later built a substantial online following through political commentary, conspiracy-related content and discussions of religion.

He will now spend approximately seven years in custody under the terms of his sentence, with any remaining period served under license and subject to possible recall to prison if he breaches its conditions.

Fortnite Players Are Chasing a 1-in-137,500 Pirate Shop Token, and the Claims Keep Rolling In

Share

Fortnite players are tearing through treasure chests looking for one of the rarest rewards Epic Games has ever offered. The Pirate Shop Access token lets lucky players claim almost everything in the Item Shop without spending V-Bucks, but finding one is proving remarkably difficult.

The reward arrived November 1 with Fortnite's Treasure Hunters mini-season and One Piece crossover. Players who find the token receive two separate opportunities to claim free cosmetics, each lasting 14 days. The first must be activated by December 15, 2026, while the second can be used in 2027.

Eligible outfits, emotes, pickaxes and other cosmetics claimed during those periods stay in the player's locker permanently. Real-money purchases, gifting and Battle Pass rewards are excluded. Players can also claim only one free Sidekick they don't already own.

After nearly a week of players demanding answers, Epic finally revealed the official drop rates on November 7.

The chance of finding Pirate Shop Access in a normal chest is just 1 in 137,500.

Those odds have remained unchanged since the season began, according to Epic. The exception is Treasure Hours, when the drop rate receives temporary boosts. Some sessions offer 1.5 times the normal chance, while a special November 7 session doubled it.

Even with those boosts, the odds are rough.

Opening 1,000 chests at the normal rate gives a player approximately a 0.7% chance of finding at least one token, assuming independent drops. It takes roughly 95,300 chests just to reach a 50% chance. There's no guaranteed reward after opening a particular number.

That hasn't stopped players from hunting.

Social media has been filling with screenshots, gameplay clips and posts from people claiming they've unlocked the prize. One of the earliest documented winners, a player known as snowslept, shared footage of a successful chest drop on November 1.

Other players have spent hours searching without anything to show for it.

But exactly how many people have found Pirate Shop Access?

Nobody outside Epic appears to have a reliable answer.

The company hasn't published a running total of successful drops, and there's no official public tracker identifying every winner. While some players have shared footage of their rewards, other claims are supported only by screenshots or social media posts.

There's also the squad-sharing feature to consider.

When one player finds Pirate Shop Access, their teammates receive it too. That means a single successful chest can reward up to four people, making the number of players showing off the token different from the number of winning chests.

Meanwhile, theories about improving the odds continue circulating online. Some players have suggested wearing particular skins, opening specific chests or landing at certain locations.

There's no verified evidence that any of those tricks work.

For now, the only established ways to improve the chances of finding Pirate Shop Access are to open more chests, play with teammates and take advantage of the boosted rates during Treasure Hours.

With the Treasure Hunters mini-season scheduled to end December 5, players still have time to search, although even thousands of opened chests may not be enough.

And for anyone lucky enough to find the token, there's another decision to make: when to activate those 14 days of free shopping.

Dave Chappelle Says He Feels Better Since Charlie Kirk’s Murder

Share

Dave Chappelle told a Madison Square Garden audience during his Karmageddon tour that he has felt better ever since Charlie Kirk was murdered.

“I feel fucked up saying this. It’s scary being a public speaker. And I mean look, ever since that guy Charlie Kirk got murdered … and I shouldn’t say this publicly but, I feel better,” Chappelle said. He added that he knows he shouldn’t say it, that it’s just a feeling he didn’t ask for, and that he sometimes finds himself driving around in a good mood before realizing why.

The remarks, delivered Friday night as part of back-to-back shows tied to the New York Comedy Festival, drew laughter and some applause from the crowd. Clips spread quickly on social media Saturday.

Charlie Kirk, the Turning Point USA founder and conservative activist, was shot and killed on September 10, 2025, while speaking at an outdoor event at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. A 23-year-old man, Tyler Robinson, faces charges including aggravated murder in the case, which prosecutors have described as politically motivated.

Conservative commentators and online users reacted with sharp criticism. Benny Johnson called the bit “sick” and said it “isn’t even comedy.” Rob Henderson, who attended the show, posted a version of the line and noted the oddness of framing pleasure at a murder as involuntary. Others labeled it a celebration of political violence.

Many of those criticizing Chappelle also highlighted Kirk’s earlier defense of the comedian. In May 2022, a man rushed Chappelle on stage at the Hollywood Bowl during a Netflix Is a Joke Festival performance, tackling him. The attacker, Isaiah Lee, carried a replica handgun that contained a knife blade. Authorities charged him with felony assault with a deadly weapon. Kirk publicly condemned the response from prosecutors at the time, arguing that failing to treat the attack seriously sent a message that political violence against certain speakers was acceptable.

Benny Johnson and others recirculated Kirk’s 2022 comments alongside the new Chappelle clip, framing the latest material as an ungrateful response.




Not everyone shared the outrage. The live audience response included laughter. Some online observers treated the line as typical Chappelle edge, consistent with his history of testing boundaries. Short clips circulating online leave the full context of the routine unclear, and Chappelle has not issued a public statement elaborating on the remarks. Coverage from left leaning media has focused more on the intensity of the right’s reaction than on condemning the joke itself.

Chappelle had previously addressed Kirk’s death in his Netflix special The Unstoppable. There he said the killing left him “shook” as a fellow public speaker, while rejecting comparisons between Kirk and Martin Luther King Jr. as a stretch that rested mainly on both men being shot in the neck.

The latest comments arrive more than a year after the assassination and land in a climate where jokes about political violence continue to expose deep divides over what counts as fair game in comedy.



FBI Agents Reported a Silent Black Triangle. Two Government UFO Reports Don't Agree

Share

Two FBI agents reported seeing a mysterious black triangular object rise above a mountain ridge near a sensitive U.S. security facility. It made no sound, appeared to hover and then disappeared at tremendous speed. But newly released government records tell conflicting stories about how long the encounter actually lasted.

The sighting reportedly happened in June 2026 at an undisclosed location in the western United States. Details emerged October 23 when the Pentagon released another batch of UFO documents as part of President Donald Trump's disclosure initiative.

According to the records, a third federal agent detected an unusual object using thermal equipment and alerted two colleagues at a nearby observation post.

The agents moved to get a better look and spotted a matte-black triangular object above a ridgeline several miles away.

They estimated its wingspan at 9 to 15 feet and described it as resembling a delta-wing drone. They couldn't see any obvious engines, propellers or exhaust.

The Pentagon's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) recorded a particularly unusual sequence.

According to its memorandum, the object climbed vertically about 200 to 300 feet above the ridge without tilting or wobbling. It then stopped and hovered for approximately 20 seconds before accelerating into a nearby canyon at a speed the witnesses compared to a military fighter jet.

The agents reported hearing no engine or rotor noise throughout the encounter.

One witness also observed the object through a handheld infrared device and reported an even thermal signature without obvious exhaust or engine hot spots.

A search of the canyon the following morning reportedly found no wreckage or signs of an impact.

There's one rather significant problem, though.

The FBI and Pentagon accounts don't match.

The agents' signed FBI statement says the entire sighting lasted approximately three seconds.

AARO's separate memorandum describes roughly ten seconds of vertical movement, 20 seconds of hovering and another two to three seconds of rapid flight.

That's a difference of nearly half a minute.

The documents also disagree on the time of the encounter. The FBI account places the initial detection at approximately 7:23 p.m., while AARO records it at 8:23 p.m.

Neither document explains the discrepancies.

There is also no publicly available instrument measurement confirming the object's reported speed. Although some coverage has mentioned speeds approaching 1,800 mph, that figure should not be mistaken for a verified measurement.

Images circulating alongside the reports show a dark triangle against a mountain landscape. Those images are digitally created illustrations, not photographs of the object.

Former AARO director Sean Kirkpatrick questioned the strength of the evidence in comments to Fox News on November 1.

Kirkpatrick said that credible witnesses can still misidentify objects and pointed to historical sightings of secret military aircraft, including the F-117 stealth fighter, as examples of how unfamiliar technology can generate UFO reports.

He also warned against interpreting an unresolved case as evidence of extraterrestrial activity.

The newly released records don't establish that the object was alien, experimental military technology or anything else.

They do, however, document a remarkable account from federal agents, alongside substantial inconsistencies in the government's own records.

AARO considered the incident worthy of further investigation because of similarities to other sightings reported in the western United States.

The exact location remains classified, the witnesses' identities are redacted, and no publicly released footage independently confirms the reported movements.

The original FBI observation report and AARO memorandum are available online for anyone who wants to compare the accounts.View all nine FBI reconstruction frames